X-Rcpt-Trace: gkrellm at lists.netservicesgroup.com
Received-SPF: pass (Last token {include:_netblocks.google.com} (res=PASS)) client-ip=209.85.161.42; envelope-from=<muhri.net@gmail.com>; x-ip-name=mail-oo1-f42.google_com;
X-Received: from mail-oo1-f42.google.com (unverified [209.85.161.42])
by mailproc.sbbsnet.net (Network-Services-Group-Email) with ESMTP (TLS) id 11596-1928206
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:03:19 -0400
X-Return-Path: muhri.net
X-Received: by mail-oo1-f42.google.com with SMTP id p10-20020a056820044a00b00320d7d4af22so783037oou.4
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=cBwFKu5GZOLX6rZBKjCAM/i/w7dxpHrtD+Y03QrcsLQ=;
b=gyvjLP+1MXyvAXj0bCXN79/e0Ad5zWCGRnCHC95ByhkfLzq4bgbAtWiGvyDjNyoYsc
AZQMbS3qE2Jx6pV+Ddaz4ZEbjVHZoAu2uzstWjFhzZKjUCnViwwWL6V4AfkcNxLE6QNW
ZCFa9dbWnUK5jX7h8fhTXms0DADE0tsR9FH4SStIdGfcvkqaOn8HoAx62EF3iNTJzFrB
0oUJpXZVznT6GrUpYX3FO5oXAY0XwYZX/e9a2nHvsI46Rvwl4KcnE2mFjU+K3LncEEgT
Tyb2eC+JVRl7fLBT2ou7SudP9W2y2tvLn4hgmwkSiAS2xJxsnNtgd4gTbYIE230weZKo
oKJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BLqzfUe0Kx4am2rygYysGsWWBJFLHVpYOozSNrC0bPIcsMb/9
/qbQ51VoX5286EfT/ew+g4X0sgfTJD29MHptucG5fSLy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyP4JpOWE8WotrQRnj+HS+FMDZksQGPs/oWmYsPuqZNGrUoGAYtPpd+vm4PagFQHvwCniRnWwRjsiQpYq1GCLs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b40a:b0:d7:5c87:64ab with SMTP id
x10-20020a056870b40a00b000d75c8764abmr2548891oap.168.1647385398163; Tue, 15
Mar 2022 16:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <OFZQJTQF.C6LDE5TP.7A3LVP6V@QUAHF653.DOKZQUXP.PZ37LJVL>
<IRWPOCUQ.2TVCSDGS.IQZFGBAB@254CFXCJ.WK4WVONL.4UPX43LD> <CAKvAOpNEG2S_6m6rpJaHzqb3r-7o0UPWXRNAJTR3fh8315t2cA@mail.gmail.com>
<GLBY5R54.A776226S.YUXUG5A7@B2OXVNIF.FM6IAQBQ.K53TKHBL>
In-Reply-To: <GLBY5R54.A776226S.YUXUG5A7@B2OXVNIF.FM6IAQBQ.K53TKHBL>
From: Maher Awamy
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 02:03:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CAKvAOpPSoY+TXsHcwpDTjeAsUv2J64bJUmTTKscv_oTLUKb6Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gkrellm] RIP Bill Wilson
To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
X-Originating-IP: 209.85.161.42
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=209.85.161.42
X-Qnum: 11596
X-ORBS-Accept: dnswl_none
X-Rcpt-To: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
X-SpamDetect: *****: 5.0 sd=5.0 lv=0.00 nok=8/0 m=7 nf=0 Close 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.10(X-myrbl:Color=yellow) 0.88(BContent4) 0.69(genuine_gmail) 0.67(free_email) 0.36(dnswl_none) 0.37(X-PhraseHits:god) 0.38(From isn't in return path) 0.55(X-Verify-MX present) 0.53(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.47(genuine) 0.48(StandardTLD) 0.48(spfpass) 0.48(X-Verify-Helo:+OK) Saned 5.0 Sval 7.1 bsan 5.0 NotSaned s=7.1 was=5.0 Sval 7.1
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8
X-LangGuess: English
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: +OK mail-oo1-f42.google.com
X-Verify-MX: <muhri.net@gmail.com> senders ip (ch=209.85.161.42 msg=209.85.161.42, net=209.85.) not in mx data dom=gmail.com ipname=mail-oo1-f42.google.com (142.251.6.26 173.194.77.26 173.194.219.2)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow (from rbl) ip=209.85.161.42
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 1317, in=317, out=0, spam=0 ip=209.85.161.42
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gkrellm-leave@lists.netservicesgroup.com?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
List-ID: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, I will send an email in hope he reads it. So saddened by this.
He replied from WWILSON53@austin.rr.com which was Bill's email. He
said he just monitors that mailbox periodically.
On 2022.03.15 17:53, Maher Awamy wrote:
> Oh my god, this is such sad news! RIP Bill, Jack, do you have Jesse's
> email
> so I can extend my condolences?
>
> :(
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022, 00:33 Jack <ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On 2022.03.10 16:56, Jack wrote:
> > > On 2021.01.14 16:21, Bill Wilson wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:15:12 +0100 Stefan Gehn
> > >> <stefan+gkrellm@srcbox.net> wrote:
> > > [snip....]
> > >>> One ticket I could immediately think of myself is the port to
> Gtk+
> > >>> 3/4 which will be inevitable at some point (hey, it survived the
> > >>> port from Gtk+ 1 to 2 too).
> > >>
> > >> It's OK with me. Gtk4 says it "deemphasizes" gdk-pixbuf. At the
> > >> point it becomes deprecated it will be an issue where "porting"
> > >> really means a major rewrite. I don't know what will happen
> then.
> > >
> > > Has there been any activity on this at all? Might it be worth
> > > porting to gtk3/4 without touching the gdk-pixbuf stuff. That
> would
> > > at lest change the dependency away from gtk2. Do I interpret the
> > > previous comment correctly that that should not be particularly
> > > difficult, or is that just overly simplistic/naive?
> > >
> > > Jack
> > I just received a response to my message from Jesse Wilson, Bill's
> > brother, informing me that Bill passed away last October 14th
> after a
> > short bout with cancer.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
>