X-Rcpt-Trace: gkrellm at lists.netservicesgroup.com
Received-SPF: pass (Last token {include:_netblocks.google.com} (res=PASS)) client-ip=209.85.167.176; envelope-from=<muhri.net@gmail.com>; x-ip-name=mail-oi1-f176.google_com;
X-Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (unverified [209.85.167.176])
by mailproc.sbbsnet.net (Network-Services-Group-Email) with ESMTP (TLS) id 11137-1928206
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:53:38 -0400
X-Return-Path: muhri.net
X-Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id q189so708742oia.9
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=zI1S8ac0Izsc/JibnBzn7RxnU3EqqExj06WpLcXeJD0=;
b=aQ3hmgjKaI7KDzigjdjqIakAc/v8Fi72PKJlUpADiG1PBfywXfZ4O7PPLLBt704I5g
va2aDJNdgPU2ll24qwaJNGN7y14JbaRu/3njMEvl4P/ic2I0VrZTPF3HoXtepriBBr0M
2JecORDr2c6kWjQ87O+fOiwCoOpiDZGeJvO5AXi3nKCxTLkvWwwq6iFLISTeqxMnnQH+
i2kfBzXHPC1xJ7+KY8QQlLVM78TVXsffO0xyR2A5wkMVWfaqt0jauTCEy8lXcWZdPxHl
0j0HYdFq643823m8TLIRp6AHAIw9vH7ncHzbiGuDx/r8mI53ISrwq60cyrIZOppr+3tm
EBPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JtvXXDRA9/D7L92AEWWAscUkp7Zo6c1AhN5Nkb7WxXfUL9PqD
eflmcE9HcP+YuRu/69BXgwzVyqOfh0WGqyZU6919651W
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFR2n+XyWGVo32duagT3HHCQgonLKO6ZRQo9//WBfgDBU2feFrowwgAqC1zlDpbZCFxMWaoDeAfkEk9OUUm0w=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a16:0:b0:2ec:e1ae:9c6b with SMTP id
a22-20020aca1a16000000b002ece1ae9c6bmr2682093oia.168.1647381217832; Tue, 15
Mar 2022 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <OFZQJTQF.C6LDE5TP.7A3LVP6V@QUAHF653.DOKZQUXP.PZ37LJVL> <IRWPOCUQ.2TVCSDGS.IQZFGBAB@254CFXCJ.WK4WVONL.4UPX43LD>
In-Reply-To: <IRWPOCUQ.2TVCSDGS.IQZFGBAB@254CFXCJ.WK4WVONL.4UPX43LD>
From: Maher Awamy
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:53:26 +0300
Message-ID: <CAKvAOpNEG2S_6m6rpJaHzqb3r-7o0UPWXRNAJTR3fh8315t2cA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gkrellm] RIP Bill Wilson Was: gtk port Was: On enabling issues
at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm
To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com, ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net
X-Originating-IP: 209.85.167.176
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=209.85.167.176
X-Qnum: 11137
X-ORBS-Accept: dnswl_none
X-Rcpt-To: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
X-SpamDetect: *****: 5.0 sd=5.0 lv=0.00 nok=8/0 m=7 nf=0 Close 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.10(X-myrbl:Color=yellow) 0.88(BContent4) 0.69(genuine_gmail) 0.67(free_email) 0.36(dnswl_none) 0.37(X-PhraseHits:god) 0.38(From isn't in return path) 0.55(X-Verify-MX present) 0.53(X-NotAscii:utf) 0.47(genuine) 0.48(StandardTLD) 0.48(spfpass) 0.48(X-Verify-Helo:+OK) Saned 5.0 Sval 7.1 bsan 5.0 NotSaned s=7.1 was=5.0 Sval 7.1
X-NotAscii: charset=utf-8
X-LangGuess: English
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: +OK mail-oi1-f176.google.com
X-Verify-MX: <muhri.net@gmail.com> senders ip (ch=209.85.167.176 msg=209.85.167.176, net=209.85.) not in mx data dom=gmail.com ipname=mail-oi1-f176.google.com (142.251.6.26 173.194.77.27 173.194.219.2)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=0 Stars=0 Good=1 Friend=2 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=209.85.167.176
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 1265, in=792, out=0, spam=0 ip=209.85.167.176
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gkrellm-leave@lists.netservicesgroup.com?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
List-ID: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh my god, this is such sad news! RIP Bill, Jack, do you have Jesse's email so I can extend my condolences?
:(
On 2022.03.10 16:56, Jack wrote:
> On 2021.01.14 16:21, Bill Wilson wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:15:12 +0100 Stefan Gehn
>> <stefan+gkrellm@srcbox.net> wrote:
> [snip....]
>>> One ticket I could immediately think of myself is the port to Gtk+
>>> 3/4 which will be inevitable at some point (hey, it survived the
>>> port from Gtk+ 1 to 2 too).
>>
>> It's OK with me. Gtk4 says it "deemphasizes" gdk-pixbuf. At the
>> point it becomes deprecated it will be an issue where "porting"
>> really means a major rewrite. I don't know what will happen then.
>
> Has there been any activity on this at all? Might it be worth
> porting to gtk3/4 without touching the gdk-pixbuf stuff. That would
> at lest change the dependency away from gtk2. Do I interpret the
> previous comment correctly that that should not be particularly
> difficult, or is that just overly simplistic/naive?
>
> Jack
I just received a response to my message from Jesse Wilson, Bill's
brother, informing me that Bill passed away last October 14th after a
short bout with cancer.
Jack