X-Rcpt-Trace: gkrellm at lists.netservicesgroup.com
Received-SPF: none (No spf1 record for (aya.yale.edu) ) client-ip=209.85.219.54; envelope-from=<ostroffjh@aya.yale.edu>; x-ip-name=mail-qv1-f54.google_com;
X-Received: from mail-qv1-f54.google.com (unverified [209.85.219.54])
by mailproc.sbbsnet.net (Network-Services-Group-Email) with ESMTP (TLS) id 10973-1928206
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:31:08 -0400
X-Return-Path: ostroffjh
X-Received: by mail-qv1-f54.google.com with SMTP id kd12so535661qvb.1
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:mime-version:in-reply-to
:message-id:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=m/oaGJDuIoaWexWhp5Kqgp0NPjBV4WfPFQVbtLj1GKc=;
b=l1LlyCyYu0wufu+oPtqouRUowap+Kwh0r9iECaNSlejxw7g2j5qjddYDtOYFAMCQd1
rEQRd+gVb4FAyAk+qWzCNZKk+SSIYaXg1N40KmdpnjS/iUQx4h0sI1WS+w9TBbuFzJ7t
r1oX/VF5HYShB48JuQhNSCF3R1vAGTeYlEoPdbXsUxDTc/MnE/vcYDPNetxoOiTa1COv
YRusScVSuzAbiPgI6N+EXXk55HJa0V4horku/gnV+dTWfXN1xhzv+2uO2iG/eQxtWC5o
UX6n2sd7Lltz5JmDxZ/Efgo4x4ZcGqScGl2nzoVSDz4ObO0ykVg+zY25elK6rsO6TTKz
zxZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309B2P0VH11HLC+WqsrGR64ZAi6xulNBbNHTshos8Xs4xFxd2xW
PP+XIfAuFRIXFukJofsIi5hHJpPzTe3Wqw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxk6lQJT50KE4z/+o6X60tRyyQHFOnHke9YdKvaO0/zvC/QqT8bkkrnLrXlLWPDaM6CeFmgBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a4a:b0:435:8b63:ecfb with SMTP id jf10-20020a0562142a4a00b004358b63ecfbmr23178941qvb.44.1647379867274;
Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Return-Path: ostroffjh
X-Received: from ffortso9 (c-76-23-130-96.hsd1.ct.comcast.net. [76.23.130.96])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z203-20020a3765d4000000b0067b48d49c65sm25901qkb.95.2022.03.15.14.31.06
for <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:31:05 -0400
From: Jack
Subject: [Gkrellm] RIP Bill Wilson Was: gtk port Was: On enabling issues at
https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm
To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <OFZQJTQF.C6LDE5TP.7A3LVP6V@QUAHF653.DOKZQUXP.PZ37LJVL>
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.6.3-real-48-gdb213c65b
Message-Id: <IRWPOCUQ.2TVCSDGS.IQZFGBAB@254CFXCJ.WK4WVONL.4UPX43LD>
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: 209.85.219.54
X-Country: code=US country="United States" ip=209.85.219.54
X-Qnum: 10973
X-ORBS-Accept: dnswl_none
X-Rcpt-To: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
X-SpamDetect: **: 2.5 sd=2.5 lv=7.00 nok=2/1 m=2 nf=0 Close 0.04(X-myrbl:Color=white) 0.90(X-Phrase:isspam) 0.29(X-NotAscii:us-ascii) 0.36(dnswl_none) 0.38(From isn't in return path) 0.55(X-Verify-MX present) 0.48(StandardTLD) 0.48(X-Verify-Helo:+OK) 0.50(X-LangGuess:English) Sval 2.5 bsan 7.0 Moved 7.0->2.5 Sval 2.5
X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii;
X-LangGuess: English
X-Phrase: IsSpam score=1.00
X-Verify-Helo: +OK mail-qv1-f54.google.com
X-Verify-MX: <ostroffjh@aya.yale.edu> senders ip (ch=209.85.219.54 msg=209.85.219.54, net=209.85.) not in mx data dom=aya.yale.edu ipname=mail-qv1-f54.google.com (142.250.152.27 173.194.219.27 173.194.77)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=White (from rbl) ip=209.85.219.54
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 860, in=294, out=0, spam=0 ip=209.85.219.54
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gkrellm-leave@lists.netservicesgroup.com?subject=unsubscribe>
X-Mailing-List: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
List-ID: <gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gkrellm@lists.netservicesgroup.com
On 2022.03.10 16:56, Jack wrote:
> On 2021.01.14 16:21, Bill Wilson wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:15:12 +0100 Stefan Gehn
>> <stefan+gkrellm@srcbox.net> wrote:
> [snip....]
>>> One ticket I could immediately think of myself is the port to Gtk+
>>> 3/4 which will be inevitable at some point (hey, it survived the
>>> port from Gtk+ 1 to 2 too).
>>
>> It's OK with me. Gtk4 says it "deemphasizes" gdk-pixbuf. At the
>> point it becomes deprecated it will be an issue where "porting"
>> really means a major rewrite. I don't know what will happen then.
>
> Has there been any activity on this at all? Might it be worth
> porting to gtk3/4 without touching the gdk-pixbuf stuff. That would
> at lest change the dependency away from gtk2. Do I interpret the
> previous comment correctly that that should not be particularly
> difficult, or is that just overly simplistic/naive?
>
> Jack
I just received a response to my message from Jesse Wilson, Bill's
brother, informing me that Bill passed away last October 14th after a
short bout with cancer.
Jack
|